It’s a nice word! Roughly means the placement of two contrasting items or concepts near each other At least I think that’s what it means and I can’t be bothered checking or I may have to change the headline.
In yesterdays SCMP I noticed a few items that fit the criteria and had me chuckling. The item that caught my attention was a small side bar on page A9 with the headline: “British Minister backs bigger role for Religion.” Here is the small item: “Europe is threatened by a wave of ‘militant secularism’, and religion should play a bigger role in public life, a British Cabinet minister said. Sayeeda Warsi, a Muslim, said: “Europe should become more confident and more comfortable in it’s Christianity…Militant secularists have the same intolerant instincts as authoritarian regimes.” Pish, twaddle, crap, bullshit and possibly agenda setting for some militant muslim shite. But I won’t rip her apart here, she’s made it too easy for me, not least by going to meet the ex-Hitler youth member and protector of pedophiles at the Vatican.
In fact the SCMP did my job for me.
On the same page, leading article: “Bombings hint at tit-for-tat response.” Story? Attacks on Israeli Scientists by Iranians, cause of dispute, Jew Vs Shia Muslim hate. Root? Religion! The story underneath headlined: ” US warships transit Hormuz strait.” The headline explains the story really, but why is it a story? Tensions between an Evangelical Christian country and again, Shia Muslims, Iran. Religion again! Still on the same page. “We won’t protect Assad Says Wen.” This story refers to the ongoing strife in Syria. At the root of the strife, beneath the layers of confusion is really Islam’s version of Catholic vs Protestant strife, namely Shia Vs Sunni. Oh, religion again!
All that on just one page!
So where is the evidence for this militant secular intolerance woman? Where in the world is there currently religionists being persecuted by militant secularists?
The only militancy secularists and atheists practice is in open debate. Why? Because we want to free those that have been indoctrinated by dogma and coerced into believing myth is fact. We want to free them to be free thinkers and free the world of religious inspired hatred.
So in my humble opinion, we need less, much less religion in public life, not more and we would quickly see less trouble in all areas of the world.
NB: Found this interesting fact yesterday, the oldest tree in the world is 9000 years old, where does that leave creationists?